Clear and cogent thinking on some of the implications of the IP Bill going through parliament really mean.
It’s telling that MPs seem to have swallowed the ‘itemised phone bill’ analogy. It suggests that they either don’t realise what happens in an online world or are so out of touch they don’t care.
There are many things in the new draft Investigatory Powers Bill that need very careful attention – some of which may be cautiously welcomed, some of which need to be taken with a distinct pinch of salt. The issues surrounding ‘Bulk Powers’ (which we’re not supposed to call ‘mass surveillance’) and ‘Equipment Interference’ (which I presume we’re not supposed to call hacking) will be examined in great detail, and quite rightly so because they’re of critical importance, and clearly recognised as such. The issue of ‘Internet Connection Records’, on the other hand, does not yet seem to have been given the attention it deserves – but I am sure that will change, because the collection of them has massive significance and represents a major change in surveillance, for all that they are described in the introduction to the bill as just ‘restoring capabilities that have been lost as a result of…
View original post 1,194 more words